Your barbell example is flawed, because it does not start with an equal basis. If we increase the size of the print, we are changing a variable and the results might be different, but most people do not print larger than In the categories APS-C and FF a panel of 10 people could not tell the prints apart by camera brand. My point of view was print quality in a blind test.Īn example of what that means is the following: The American publication Consumer Reports Magazine test different cameras in different categories using 8x10 prints. Are you trying to test for recovering shadows at high ISO, dynamic range, AF, camera useability, print quality, etc. Normally tests are set up to test for one variable, everything else remaining the same. He was Billy Grahams photographer for like 45 years, Russ Busby and he shared some stories and advice with me! All in front of the Canon Service center in Irvine, - You expressed an opinion without data to support your conclusions., that is subjective and flawed science.īefore you can do a test, you need to determine what you are trying to test.
Good shuttercount on 5d mark iii free#
It was about an $850 repair they said, but they did it free of charge and had it back to me in less than 48 hours!!! I was amazed and I also got to meet an amazing man that day I picked up my gear. The two married, meaning the two mounts bent together and I couldn’t remove the camera or lens from each other. I was at Canon a few times for repairs, once was completely my fault, I set my Canon 1D Mark III and 400mm f/2.8L IS down too fast. So I can easily pick up and use either or, but I choose Nikon for the ergonomics and the fact they just never failed me. For awhile I did go all in on Canon and sold all of my gear twice to switch between the two. I shot Canon all my career but also shot or owned Nikon. Love Canon and their CPS service is better than Nikons and they are actually right down the road from me. Let's hope the camera still has a lot more left to give, although it's certainly surpassed all reasonable expectations of longevity. The camera came with a six-month warranty (impressive, given that the shutter could stop working at any moment), a Canon battery, a Canon charger, and a front battery cap. MPB discloses shutter counts for its cameras, so there was no surprise when he checked the shutter actuation for himself using ShutterCount. Creating timelapse videos requires you to capture many photos, so you could conceivably rack up a high shutter count during 14 years of shooting.įoxTailWhipz paid $199 for the "Good" condition 5D Mark II.
What seems more likely is that the camera was used in a studio environment much of the time or perhaps was used as a timelapse camera. Of course, that's possible if the owner was cautious – and probably a bit lucky. It doesn't look like a camera that was out in the field for all 2.2M shots, so it probably wasn't used primarily as a sports or wildlife camera. Its buttons and dials all work, and everything appears fully functional. The camera has some visible signs of wear, but it's not especially beat up. It's a staggering number of photos, so what was the original owner using their 5D Mark II to capture? Unfortunately, we can't say for certain, so we can only speculate.
0 kommentar(er)
